Skip to content
Journal of
Future Sciences
Essays · experiments · imagined sciences2026 / Working edition

Research / metascience

Research notes

Can a researcher working with an archive cut off in 1900 derive a discovery made later? The proposed study would test this using historically available methods. The difficulty is keeping later knowledge out of the experiment.

Historical-discovery benchmark / proposal

Testing scientific discovery with a 1900 archive

The investigator would receive scientific publications available at the cutoff date. The test must also account for knowledge already embedded in a model's training and for laboratory equipment that did not yet exist.

Deriving a mathematical result is different from naming a later discovery. A convincing trial would preregister targets, document failed attempts and check whether each proposed experiment could have been performed with available equipment. No such trial has been conducted here.

Archive cutoff / available apparatus / derivations / checks

Research dossier 001 / AI and mathematical discovery / October 2026

Who discovered the theorem?

From program search to formal proofs of open problems, machine contributions to mathematics do not fit a single category. Five source-linked cases follow the different roles played by researchers, models, proof checkers and mathematical judgment.

The dossier includes an interactive contribution ledger: alter what you count as discovery and examine how the evidence changes. The selected cases do not measure AI's share of all mathematics.

Read the illustrated investigation ↗
Other proposalsUNFINISHED STUDIES

History and philosophy of science

Inference from singular events

Some events leave many independent traces even though they cannot be repeated. What kinds of inference can be made from those traces?

Metascience

Search and conceptual change

A researcher may need to invent a new representation before any useful hypothesis can be tested. How could a study detect that change?

Forecasting and institutions

Instruments and access

When an experiment requires expensive equipment, it matters who had access to the equipment and who could publish the results.

Philosophy of evidence

Taxonomies and detectors

Two laboratories build detectors for different properties of the same specimens. Their classifications may disagree. To decide which is useful, compare what each predicts about previously untested specimens.

Computational modeling

System identification in an artificial world

Construct a simple world with hidden physical rules. Give investigators instruments and a restricted set of interventions, then compare their inferences with the rules used to build it.

The future of academia

Training in machine-intensive sciences

If software produces most new results, what must students still learn to judge an argument or identify a faulty experiment?